CHEMTRAILS: FINALLY, SOME
ANSWERS
Canadian investigative
reporter William Thomas has uncovered, through tenacious and prodigious
research, some answers to the mysterious chemtrail issue.� �Chemtrails� are chemical laden vapor
trails dispersed at high altitudes by US military tanker aircraft and by
some private aircraft under top-secret contracts with the US government. A
draft version of Thomas� report can be read online at http://www.nexusmagazine.com/chemtrails.html.� I don�t agree with everything Thomas writes
or speculates about, but I will summarize his conclusions and share my analysis
of what I think is well founded.
The chemtrail phenomenon has
been observed for many years in different parts of the US as well as in other
allied nations.� These chemtrails are
primarily characterized by thick trails of white vapor, which persist for long
periods of time, gradually dispersing to cover wide areas of the sky.� Let�s review some of the major differences
between these chemical vapor trails and the normal, harmless condensation
trails (�contrails�) often emitted by aircraft.� There are several critical distinguishing characteristics between
these two types of emissions:
1)� Chemtrails often occur at altitudes and in environmental conditions
where normal contrails cannot and do not occur.� According to NOAA meteorologist Thomas
Schlatter, quoted in the article, �At temperatures lower than approx� -40 deg F�
contrails almost always form, regardless of relative humidity. The
higher the ambient temperature, the less likely that contrails will form. At
temperatures above -40 degrees F, contrails are not expected. The persistence
of contrails depends upon temperature, relative humidity, and the vigor of
mixing between the exhaust plume and the ambient air. At low temperatures, with
high humidity, and with stable temperature stratification (which inhibits
vertical mixing of the air), contrails persist for many hours."� Chemtrails also occur at altitudes where
contrails occur and thus the two are mixed.�
2)� Chemtrails persist for many hours and spread out continuously
until wide areas of the sky are covered.�
Contrails spread out only slightly and evaporate within 10 seconds to
several hours, depending on the upper air humidity and temperature.� Contrails can persist under exceptional
circumstances, so this is not a definitive criteria.
3) Contrails are always pure
white and don�t exhibit much halo effect.�
Chemtrails have an oily glint to them, with pronounced
rainbow-like color effects (reddish or pinkish tint) as the sun shines
through.� Some of the best photographic
evidence of chemtrails is found at http://www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm.
4) Contrails are composed
of water vapor combined with a small amount of residue from burned jet
fuel.�� Analysis of chemtrail residues,
in contrast, claims to have uncovered a variety of chemicals and other
substances, including barium, aluminum oxide, microscopic fibers and oil-based
products, none of which are intrinsic to normal jet fuel.
5)� Contrails exit directly behind the engines of the
aircraft, which produce the moisture.�
Thus, aircraft will exhibit only 1, 2, 3, or 4 distinct condensation
trails, each trailing an engine.�
Chemtrails, in contrast, are expelled from multiple ports along the entire
wing surface, not directly in line with the engines.�� Once again, see the pictures on www.carnicom.com.� These photos are perhaps the most definitive
of all chemtrail evidence. Some debunkers use cropped photos of high-G
manuevers which gives off aerodynamic condensation from the wing--as a supposed
explanation to wing emitted chemtrails.�
But this is bogus.� Aerodynamic
condensation doesn�t occur in straight and level flight and never leaves a long
contrail.� It also shows up within
inches of the wing trailing edge, unlike chemtrail spraying.��
6)� Contrails cannot be shut on and off at will, nor abruptly,
as witnesses have seen in numerous sightings of chemical spraying by
aircraft.� I personally have seen this
type of on/off spraying in Utah by two military tankers flying in loose
formation.� When numerous witnesses
called KSL--TV in Salt Lake City to investigate, KSL dutifully parroted
the government�s official response:�
that the aircraft was a government contractor flying a Lear jet and
doing experiments on ice crystal formation.� Baloney!� As one of those
witnesses, and an experienced pilot, I can tell you those two huge military
tanker aircraft were not tiny Lear jets.� The government is lying--but at least, in this case, they didn�t
try to outright deny what hundreds of people were watching, as they usually
do.� They simply tried to take advantage
of public ignorance of aircraft recognition, feeding them a phony but
marginally plausible excuse.�
7)� Aircraft dispersing chemtrails always fly back and forth over a
set area, creating circular or zig-zag patterns of vapor in the
sky.� Often many chemtrail aircraft can
be seen in one area, flying in crisscross patterns laying down vapor trails
before flying off over the horizon.�
Large airliners operating under Air Traffic Control fly on set airways
and do not make such patterns in the sky.�
Government representatives have tried to pass off reports of crisscross
chemtrail patterns as merely the convergence of airliner contrails at normal
air traffic intersections, but this is false.�
For one thing, almost all airways in the US run in straight lines.� Neither do airliners fly in close formation
with other aircraft.� In addition,
chemtrail sightings almost never come close to normal airway intersections,
lest they interfere with normal traffic or be observed by other airline
passengers.��
8) All legitimate aircraft at
high altitudes emitting contrails will be acknowledged by the FAA.� Conversely, the existence of aircraft
spraying chemicals is always denied by the FAA, under orders from the
government.� You can be on a cell phone,
in real time, reporting the presence of an aircraft overhead to the FAA and
they will tell you that no such aircraft exists on their radar screens.� They are flat-out lying.� It�s amazing to me how many military pilots
and government ATC controllers can so easily justify these lies.� Surely some are aware of the damaging health
effects reported on the internet.�
Occasionally, an honest controller will admit there is a �military
exercise� blocked out for that area.�
Many have long suspected that
the government has been using these airborne chemical sprayings to test
dispersal methods for mild forms of biological or chemical warfare.� Indeed, chemtrail sightings have long been associated
with community-wide illnesses reported in the areas of the
sprayings.� Thomas himself was involved
in a case in Espanola, Ontario, in the spring of 1998.� Residents there had been complaining of
�severe headaches, chronic joint pain, dizziness, sudden extreme fatigue, acute
asthma attacks and feverless �flu-like� symptoms over a 50-square-mile area
[which] coincided with what they termed �months of spraying� by
photo-identified US Air Force tanker planes.�� An expert witness in the case, former Ontarion Provincial Police
Officer Ted Simola, described the �lingering Xs and numerous white trails, some
of which �just ended� as if they had been shut off but remained in the sky,�
observations consistent with other chemtrail sightings.��
On November 18, 1998, the
people of Espanola petitioned Parliament, suspecting possible government
involvement in these airborne chemical emissions.� They called upon Parliament to �repeal any law that would permit
the dispersal of military chaff or of any cloud-seeding substance whatsoever by
domestic or foreign military aircraft without the informed consent of the
citizens of Canada thus affected.�� In
response to their petition, the Ministry of Defense eventually replied: �It�s
not us.�� The government assertion was mostly
true: it was not Canadian aircraft, but US Air Force tankers which were
conducting the sprayings.� Yet the
Canadian government was complicit in allowing the US to experiment over
Canada.
Thomas did finally get an
American ATC controller to talk to him, under conditions of anonymity.� The controller works on the US eastern
seaboard.� Thomas called his contact �Deep
Sky.�� Deep Sky confirmed that the
chemicals being spread in the exercises were acting as electrolytes, enhancing
conductivity of radar and radio waves.�
Additionally, the spread of the material was actually degrading, not
enhancing, ATC radars � so there had to be some other purpose behind the
sprayings.� It is significant that many
of the exercises were conducted out of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, in
Ohio, which, according to Thomas, �has long been deeply engaged in HAARP�s
electromagnetic warfare program.��
HAARP is a US government radio wave project in Alaska which could be
related to weather modification.�
HAARP�s� huge powerful transmitters
and arrays of antennas are, according to the official website, designed to heat
up the atmosphere above it.� Phasing the
antennas can skew the heating effect directionally, and may even interact with
reflective layers of metal particles in Chemtrails.� What is interesting is that HAARP�s location is at the 65th
parallel, just south of the arctic circle.�
This position corresponds to the atmospheric boundary where relatively
moist southern air moving northward collides with cold arctic air coming south.� When these dissimilar air mass meet they
rise and form new storm systems.�
Heating the atmosphere directly under this boundary layer would tend to
accelerate storm development.� Finally,
through a series of questions, Deep Sky confirmed that the US tankers were
indeed involved in climate modification experiments.�
At this point in the article,
Thomas launches into a theory that the reflective clouds are being used to
reduce the effects of global warming (Edward Teller�s theory).� He discusses the Welsback patent,
issued in 1994 to Hughes Aircraft, [long involved in government black
operations] which involves the use of a reflective blanket of
aluminum-laced cloud cover to cool the earth.�
However, I think Thomas was fed disinformation here.� The government often uses phony patents to
lead investigators down the wrong trail--especially when dealing with
HAARP.�� Global warming is a fraud.� There is no way the US government would
engage in this massive a cover-up and risk illness to the US population over a
theory with little basis in fact and even less evidence of actual damage.� Besides, government sponsored aerosol
spraying has been going on before global warming became an issue.�
However, the weather
modification process is, in my opinion, the best explanation so far as to
the widespread use of spraying.� The
reflective aluminum particles or fibers in the created cloud barriers cause
cool spots over normally warm areas, which influence the rise or fall of air
masses.� These reflective layers may
also react with HAARP transmissions in some way.�� Radio transmissions need reflective layers to channel the energy
in specific directions.� The creation of
sun or radiation shielding may explain why spraying occurs at high altitude,
during the daytime, and in cloudless areas--where the reflective
shield would be visible and effective for a long time.
None of these characteristics
fit a biological or chemical warfare test scenario.� If the government was testing delivery methods of biological or
chemical agents, it would be more likely to mix the chemicals in clouds at much
lower altitudes where it would more easily precipitate downward on the
population.� The chemtrail sprayings
always take place at high altitudes where the materials can linger or drift
long distances: hardly an accurate delivery method.� The sprayings are also done only in clear areas of the
sky--which, again, points to weather modification.
What I�m convinced of now, is
that the widespread flu-like and Alzheimer�s symptoms have been mere side
effects of the sprayed chemicals, and not the direct purpose of the
sprayings.�� The extensive use of aluminum
oxide, found as the primary component of these reflective clouds, does have
serious medical side effects and may well explain the upsurge in Alzheimer�s
disease in the US--which is reaching epidemic proportions.� I think it is also clear that the government
has been experimenting with different types and mixes of chemicals, which
explains why the observations and effects differ over time.� Several years ago, there were many sightings
of sticky droplets falling from the sky, trailing spider-web-like strands
behind.� Upon contact they made people
very ill.� Later chemical analysis has
shown a lot of aluminum oxide and micro fibers, also composed of barium and
aluminum.� People living under these
spray patterns have developed Alzheimer�s-like symptoms.
As expected, the US
continues to deny any spraying as well as any experimentation in weather
modification.� The media is totally
complicit in this cover-up as well.� The
allegations have been widespread over the internet for years.� Thousands of inquiries have gone out to the
media over the years and not once has the major media ever done a story on this
issue.�� The health consequences are
huge.� Even the politically correct
environmental movement has had no luck in pressing the media for coverage.�� There is no way to explain the media�s
refusal to investigate or give coverage to this story except that they are fully
aware of it and are under bogus�
�national security� orders to spike the story.
A US Air Force Colonel,
according to Thomas, told a senator: �The Air Force is not conducting any
weather modification and has no plans to do so in the future.��� But as Thomas retorts, �In fact, attempts
to steer hurricanes by spraying heat-robbing chemicals in their paths began in
the 1950s. The recipe for creating �cirrus shields� was outlined in an
unusually arrogant US Air Force study. Subtitled, �Owning the Weather by
2025,� the 1996 report explained how weather force specialists were
dispersing chemicals behind high-flying tanker aircraft in a process the air
force calls �aerial obscuration.����
Sounds just like what people are describing as chemtrails.� Even members of Congress know about
Chemtrails.� The term is in the list of
prohibited Space activities of Rep. Kucinich's HR 2977 �Space Preservation
Act.���� Because of the variety of
different chemicals used in Chemtrails over the past 10 years and the changing
patterns of spraying, I�m convinced the government is still experimenting
and hasn�t actually found a predictable way yet to harness the weather.�� Sadly, this only means the secret
experiments will continue and people will suffer.�
EMERGENCY HEALTH POWERS ACT
SPREADS TO THE STATES
The Neal Knox Report
(http://www.shotgunnews.com/knox/knox.dog) mentions that �The Centers for
Disease Control, which calls �gun violence� a public health epidemic, has sent
a �model law� to state legislatures which would give state agencies
unprecedented powers in the event of a public health emergency -- including the
power to seize �private property.�� The
first draft of the Model Emergency Health Powers Act -- the version
introduced in some of the 14 states where it has been filed -- specifically
includes the power to �control, restrict and
regulate ... firearms ....�� Other
sections of the bill authorize seizure and destruction of �private property�
and exempt the state from liability.���
Whenever the government engages in illegal activities they always seek
for official immunity.�